- Two adjacent beads along the same row or column are always of different colours.
- There is at least one Green bead between any two Blue beads along the same row or column.
- There is at least one Blue and at least one Green bead between any two Red beads along the same row or column.
CAT 2020 Slot 2 • Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning
Official DILR Section Past Paper Questions with Official IIM Keys & LaTeX Step-by-Step Solutions
Attempt under official TCS iON 40-Min countdown timer
Experience real test pressure with on-screen virtual calculator, section lockouts, 5-color question palette, and percentile estimation curve.
Official Exam Questions & Explanations (24 of 24)
Sorted in official convenor sequence- Two adjacent beads along the same row or column are always of different colours.
- There is at least one Green bead between any two Blue beads along the same row or column.
- There is at least one Blue and at least one Green bead between any two Red beads along the same row or column.
- Two adjacent beads along the same row or column are always of different colours.
- There is at least one Green bead between any two Blue beads along the same row or column.
- There is at least one Blue and at least one Green bead between any two Red beads along the same row or column.
- Two adjacent beads along the same row or column are always of different colours.
- There is at least one Green bead between any two Blue beads along the same row or column.
- There is at least one Blue and at least one Green bead between any two Red beads along the same row or column.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
- Seminars by students from Economics are scheduled in each of the four slots.
- A's is the only seminar that is scheduled at 10:00 am. A is guided by R.
- F is an Anthropology student whose seminar is scheduled at 10:30 am.
- The seminar of a Sociology student is scheduled at 9:00 am.
- B and G are both Sociology students, whose seminars are scheduled in the same slot. The seminar of an Economics student, who is guided by T, is also scheduled in the same slot.
- P, who is guiding both B and C, has students scheduled in the first two slots.
- A and G are scheduled in two consecutive slots.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Constituency | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of candidates contesting | 10 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
| Total No. of valid votes polled | 5,00,000 | 3,25,000 | 6,00,030 | |
| No. of votes polled by the winning candidate | 2,75,000 | 48,750 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the first runner up | 95,000 | 37,500 | ||
| No. of votes polled by the second runner up | 30,000 | |||
| % of valid votes polled by the third runner up | 10% |
- The first runner up polled 10,000 more votes than the second runner up in constituency A.
- None of the candidates who contested in constituency C lost their security deposit. The difference in votes polled by any pair of candidates in this constituency was at least 10,000.
- The winning candidate in constituency D polled 5% of valid votes more than that of the first runner up. All the candidates who lost their security deposits while contesting for this constituency, put together, polled 35% of the valid votes.
| Delhi | Mumbai | Bengaluru | Kolkata | |||||
| Sales Amounts (Crore Rupees) | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Apparels | 54 | |||||||
| Electronics | 78 | 98 | 82 | 102 | 90 | 70 | 80 | 100 |
| Home Decor | 100 | 72 | 80 | 54 | ||||
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Delhi and Kolkata in2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Mumbai and Bengaluru in 2018. This sales amount matched the sales amount in the Apparel department for Delhi in2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments were the same for Mumbai and Kolkata in 2018.
- The sum of the sales amounts of four Electronics departments increased by the same amount as the sum of the sales amounts of four Apparel departments from 2018 to 2019.
- The total sales amounts of the four Home Decor departments increased by Rs 70 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by Rs 20 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018. The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Mumbai and Kolkata also each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru in 2019 followed an Arithmetic Progression.
| Delhi | Mumbai | Bengaluru | Kolkata | |||||
| Sales Amounts (Crore Rupees) | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Apparels | 54 | |||||||
| Electronics | 78 | 98 | 82 | 102 | 90 | 70 | 80 | 100 |
| Home Decor | 100 | 72 | 80 | 54 | ||||
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Delhi and Kolkata in2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Mumbai and Bengaluru in 2018. This sales amount matched the sales amount in the Apparel department for Delhi in2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments were the same for Mumbai and Kolkata in 2018.
- The sum of the sales amounts of four Electronics departments increased by the same amount as the sum of the sales amounts of four Apparel departments from 2018 to 2019.
- The total sales amounts of the four Home Decor departments increased by Rs 70 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by Rs 20 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018. The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Mumbai and Kolkata also each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru in 2019 followed an Arithmetic Progression.
| Delhi | Mumbai | Bengaluru | Kolkata | |||||
| Sales Amounts (Crore Rupees) | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Apparels | 54 | |||||||
| Electronics | 78 | 98 | 82 | 102 | 90 | 70 | 80 | 100 |
| Home Decor | 100 | 72 | 80 | 54 | ||||
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Delhi and Kolkata in2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Mumbai and Bengaluru in 2018. This sales amount matched the sales amount in the Apparel department for Delhi in2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments were the same for Mumbai and Kolkata in 2018.
- The sum of the sales amounts of four Electronics departments increased by the same amount as the sum of the sales amounts of four Apparel departments from 2018 to 2019.
- The total sales amounts of the four Home Decor departments increased by Rs 70 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by Rs 20 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018. The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Mumbai and Kolkata also each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru in 2019 followed an Arithmetic Progression.
| Delhi | Mumbai | Bengaluru | Kolkata | |||||
| Sales Amounts (Crore Rupees) | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Apparels | 54 | |||||||
| Electronics | 78 | 98 | 82 | 102 | 90 | 70 | 80 | 100 |
| Home Decor | 100 | 72 | 80 | 54 | ||||
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Delhi and Kolkata in2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments were the same for Mumbai and Bengaluru in 2018. This sales amount matched the sales amount in the Apparel department for Delhi in2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments were the same for Mumbai and Kolkata in 2018.
- The sum of the sales amounts of four Electronics departments increased by the same amount as the sum of the sales amounts of four Apparel departments from 2018 to 2019.
- The total sales amounts of the four Home Decor departments increased by Rs 70 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Home Decor departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by Rs 20 Crores from 2018 to 2019.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi and Bengaluru each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018. The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Mumbai and Kolkata also each increased by the same amount in 2019 from 2018.
- The sales amounts in the Apparel departments of Delhi, Kolkata and Bengaluru in 2019 followed an Arithmetic Progression.
Join 2,400+ CAT Aspirants WhatsApp Study Circle
Daily PYQ doubt solving, curated DILR sets, IIM Bangalore / Ahmedabad toppers strategy sessions, and instant exam notification alerts.
Unlock 27 Full-Length CAT CBT Mocks & AI Percentile Engine
Get full access to all 2017–2025 past papers in timed exam mode, sectional drills, personal formula notebooks, and national rank percentiles.
Frequently Asked Questions about CAT 2020 Slot 2 • Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning
How many questions were asked in CAT 2020 Slot 2 DILR?
CAT 2020 Slot 2 DILR contained 20 questions. All questions carry +3 for correct answers, -1 for wrong MCQs, and 0 for TITA.
What was the difficulty level of CAT 2020 Slot 2 DILR?
According to student response metrics and expert analysis, this section had a solid mix of moderate and high-difficulty conceptual questions. View the detailed solutions above for ideal question selection strategy.
Can I practice other sections of CAT 2020 Slot 2?
Yes! You can explore the full paper or switch directly to DILR, VARC, or QA using the related sectional links below.
Related CAT Papers & Topic Mastery Hubs
Explore other slots, sections, and high-weightage topic collections