CAT 2018 Slot 2 • Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning

The base exchange rate of a currency X with respect to a currency Y is the number of units of currency Y which is equivalent in value to one unit of currency X. Currency exchange outlets buy currency at buying exchange rates that are lower than base exchange rates, and sell currency at selling exchange rates that are higher than base exchange rates. A currency exchange outlet uses the local currency L to buy and sell three international currencies A, B, and C, but does not exchange one international currency directly with another. The base exchange rates of A, B and C with respect to L are in the ratio 100:120:1. The buying exchange rates of each of A, B, and C with respect to L are 5% below the corresponding base exchange rates, and their selling exchange rates are 10% above their corresponding base exchange rates. The following facts are known about the outlet on a particular day: 1. The amount of L used by the outlet to buy C equals the amount of L it received by selling C. 2. The amounts of L used by the outlet to buy A and B are in the ratio 5:3. 3. The amounts of L the outlet received from the sales of A and B are in the ratio 5:9. 4. The outlet received 88000 units of L by selling A during the day. 5. The outlet started the day with some amount of L, 2500 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 48000 units of C. 6. The outlet ended the day with some amount of L, 3300 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 51000 units of C.

The base exchange rate of a currency X with respect to a currency Y is the number of units of currency Y which is equivalent in value to one unit of currency X. Currency exchange outlets buy currency at buying exchange rates that are lower than base exchange rates, and sell currency at selling exchange rates that are higher than base exchange rates. A currency exchange outlet uses the local currency L to buy and sell three international currencies A, B, and C, but does not exchange one international currency directly with another. The base exchange rates of A, B and C with respect to L are in the ratio 100:120:1. The buying exchange rates of each of A, B, and C with respect to L are 5% below the corresponding base exchange rates, and their selling exchange rates are 10% above their corresponding base exchange rates. The following facts are known about the outlet on a particular day: 1. The amount of L used by the outlet to buy C equals the amount of L it received by selling C. 2. The amounts of L used by the outlet to buy A and B are in the ratio 5:3. 3. The amounts of L the outlet received from the sales of A and B are in the ratio 5:9. 4. The outlet received 88000 units of L by selling A during the day. 5. The outlet started the day with some amount of L, 2500 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 48000 units of C. 6. The outlet ended the day with some amount of L, 3300 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 51000 units of C.

The base exchange rate of a currency X with respect to a currency Y is the number of units of currency Y which is equivalent in value to one unit of currency X. Currency exchange outlets buy currency at buying exchange rates that are lower than base exchange rates, and sell currency at selling exchange rates that are higher than base exchange rates. A currency exchange outlet uses the local currency L to buy and sell three international currencies A, B, and C, but does not exchange one international currency directly with another. The base exchange rates of A, B and C with respect to L are in the ratio 100:120:1. The buying exchange rates of each of A, B, and C with respect to L are 5% below the corresponding base exchange rates, and their selling exchange rates are 10% above their corresponding base exchange rates. The following facts are known about the outlet on a particular day: 1. The amount of L used by the outlet to buy C equals the amount of L it received by selling C. 2. The amounts of L used by the outlet to buy A and B are in the ratio 5:3. 3. The amounts of L the outlet received from the sales of A and B are in the ratio 5:9. 4. The outlet received 88000 units of L by selling A during the day. 5. The outlet started the day with some amount of L, 2500 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 48000 units of C. 6. The outlet ended the day with some amount of L, 3300 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 51000 units of C.

The base exchange rate of a currency X with respect to a currency Y is the number of units of currency Y which is equivalent in value to one unit of currency X. Currency exchange outlets buy currency at buying exchange rates that are lower than base exchange rates, and sell currency at selling exchange rates that are higher than base exchange rates. A currency exchange outlet uses the local currency L to buy and sell three international currencies A, B, and C, but does not exchange one international currency directly with another. The base exchange rates of A, B and C with respect to L are in the ratio 100:120:1. The buying exchange rates of each of A, B, and C with respect to L are 5% below the corresponding base exchange rates, and their selling exchange rates are 10% above their corresponding base exchange rates. The following facts are known about the outlet on a particular day: 1. The amount of L used by the outlet to buy C equals the amount of L it received by selling C. 2. The amounts of L used by the outlet to buy A and B are in the ratio 5:3. 3. The amounts of L the outlet received from the sales of A and B are in the ratio 5:9. 4. The outlet received 88000 units of L by selling A during the day. 5. The outlet started the day with some amount of L, 2500 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 48000 units of C. 6. The outlet ended the day with some amount of L, 3300 units of A, 4800 units of B, and 51000 units of C.

According to a coding scheme the sentence Peacock is designated as the national bird of India is coded as $$ $5688999351135556678564581366668913347913366$ This coding scheme has the following rules: 1. The scheme is case-insensitive (does not distinguish between upper case and lower case letters). 2. Each letter has a unique code which is a single digit from among $1,2,3, \ldots, 9$. 3. The digit $9$ codes two letters, and every other digit codes three letters. 4. The code for a word is constructed by arranging the digits corresponding to its letters in a non-decreasing sequence.

According to a coding scheme the sentence Peacock is designated as the national bird of India is coded as $$ $5688999351135556678564581366668913347913366$ This coding scheme has the following rules: 1. The scheme is case-insensitive (does not distinguish between upper case and lower case letters). 2. Each letter has a unique code which is a single digit from among $1,2,3, \ldots, 9$. 3. The digit $9$ codes two letters, and every other digit codes three letters. 4. The code for a word is constructed by arranging the digits corresponding to its letters in a non-decreasing sequence.

According to a coding scheme the sentence Peacock is designated as the national bird of India is coded as $$ $5688999351135556678564581366668913347913366$ This coding scheme has the following rules: 1. The scheme is case-insensitive (does not distinguish between upper case and lower case letters). 2. Each letter has a unique code which is a single digit from among $1,2,3, \ldots, 9$. 3. The digit $9$ codes two letters, and every other digit codes three letters. 4. The code for a word is constructed by arranging the digits corresponding to its letters in a non-decreasing sequence.

According to a coding scheme the sentence Peacock is designated as the national bird of India is coded as $$ $5688999351135556678564581366668913347913366$ This coding scheme has the following rules: 1. The scheme is case-insensitive (does not distinguish between upper case and lower case letters). 2. Each letter has a unique code which is a single digit from among $1,2,3, \ldots, 9$. 3. The digit $9$ codes two letters, and every other digit codes three letters. 4. The code for a word is constructed by arranging the digits corresponding to its letters in a non-decreasing sequence.

There are only four brands of entry level smartphones called Azra, Bysi, Cxqi, and Dipq in a country. Details about their market share, unit selling price, and profitability (defined as the profit as a percentage of the revenue) for the year 2016 are given in the table below:

In 2017, sales volume of entry level smartphones grew by 40% as compared to that in 2016. Cxqi offered a 40% discount on its unit selling price in 2017, which resulted in a 15% increase in its market share. Each of the other three brands lost 5% market share. However, the profitability of Cxqi came down to half of its value in 2016. The unit selling prices of the other three brands and their profitability values remained the same in 2017 as they were in 2016.

There are only four brands of entry level smartphones called Azra, Bysi, Cxqi, and Dipq in a country. Details about their market share, unit selling price, and profitability (defined as the profit as a percentage of the revenue) for the year 2016 are given in the table below:

In 2017, sales volume of entry level smartphones grew by 40% as compared to that in 2016. Cxqi offered a 40% discount on its unit selling price in 2017, which resulted in a 15% increase in its market share. Each of the other three brands lost 5% market share. However, the profitability of Cxqi came down to half of its value in 2016. The unit selling prices of the other three brands and their profitability values remained the same in 2017 as they were in 2016.

There are only four brands of entry level smartphones called Azra, Bysi, Cxqi, and Dipq in a country. Details about their market share, unit selling price, and profitability (defined as the profit as a percentage of the revenue) for the year 2016 are given in the table below:

In 2017, sales volume of entry level smartphones grew by 40% as compared to that in 2016. Cxqi offered a 40% discount on its unit selling price in 2017, which resulted in a 15% increase in its market share. Each of the other three brands lost 5% market share. However, the profitability of Cxqi came down to half of its value in 2016. The unit selling prices of the other three brands and their profitability values remained the same in 2017 as they were in 2016.

There are only four brands of entry level smartphones called Azra, Bysi, Cxqi, and Dipq in a country. Details about their market share, unit selling price, and profitability (defined as the profit as a percentage of the revenue) for the year 2016 are given in the table below:

In 2017, sales volume of entry level smartphones grew by 40% as compared to that in 2016. Cxqi offered a 40% discount on its unit selling price in 2017, which resulted in a 15% increase in its market share. Each of the other three brands lost 5% market share. However, the profitability of Cxqi came down to half of its value in 2016. The unit selling prices of the other three brands and their profitability values remained the same in 2017 as they were in 2016.

Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as '?'.

Additionally here are some statements from the candidates: Balaram: I was the third person to enter Room 101. Chitra: I was the last person to enter the room I was allotted to. Erina: I was the only person in the room I was allotted to. Fatima: Three people including Akil were already in the room that I was allotted to when I entered it. Ganeshan: I was one among the two candidates allotted to Room 102.

Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as '?'.

Additionally here are some statements from the candidates: Balaram: I was the third person to enter Room 101. Chitra: I was the last person to enter the room I was allotted to. Erina: I was the only person in the room I was allotted to. Fatima: Three people including Akil were already in the room that I was allotted to when I entered it. Ganeshan: I was one among the two candidates allotted to Room 102.

Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as '?'.

Additionally here are some statements from the candidates: Balaram: I was the third person to enter Room 101. Chitra: I was the last person to enter the room I was allotted to. Erina: I was the only person in the room I was allotted to. Fatima: Three people including Akil were already in the room that I was allotted to when I entered it. Ganeshan: I was one among the two candidates allotted to Room 102.

Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as '?'.

Additionally here are some statements from the candidates: Balaram: I was the third person to enter Room 101. Chitra: I was the last person to enter the room I was allotted to. Erina: I was the only person in the room I was allotted to. Fatima: Three people including Akil were already in the room that I was allotted to when I entered it. Ganeshan: I was one among the two candidates allotted to Room 102.

An agency entrusted to accredit colleges looks at four parameters: faculty quality (F), reputation (R), placement quality (P), and infrastructure (I). The four parameters are used to arrive at an overall score, which the agency uses to give an accreditation to the colleges. In each parameter, there are five possible letter grades given, each carrying certain points: A (50 points), B (40 points), C (30 points), D (20 points), and F (0 points). The overall score for a college is the weighted sum of the points scored in the four parameters. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed. $$ Accreditation is awarded based on the following scheme:

Range	Accreditation
Overall score ≥ 45	AAA
35 ≤ Overall score < 45	BAA
25 ≤ Overall score < 35	BBA
15 ≤ Overall score < 25	BBB
Overall score < 15	Junk

Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F, R, P, and I):

	F	R	P	I
A-one	A	A	A	B
Best Ed	B	C	D	D
Cosmopolitan	B	D	D	C
Dominance	D	D	B	C
Education Aid	A	A	B	A
Fancy	A	A	B	B
Global	C	F	D	D
High Q	C	D	D	B

It is further known that in terms of overall scores:

$$
1. High Q is better than Best Ed;
$$$$
2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and
$$$$
3. Education Aid is better than A-one.
$$$$

An agency entrusted to accredit colleges looks at four parameters: faculty quality (F), reputation (R), placement quality (P), and infrastructure (I). The four parameters are used to arrive at an overall score, which the agency uses to give an accreditation to the colleges. In each parameter, there are five possible letter grades given, each carrying certain points: A (50 points), B (40 points), C (30 points), D (20 points), and F (0 points). The overall score for a college is the weighted sum of the points scored in the four parameters. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed. $$ Accreditation is awarded based on the following scheme:

Range	Accreditation
Overall score ≥ 45	AAA
35 ≤ Overall score < 45	BAA
25 ≤ Overall score < 35	BBA
15 ≤ Overall score < 25	BBB
Overall score < 15	Junk

Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F, R, P, and I):

	F	R	P	I
A-one	A	A	A	B
Best Ed	B	C	D	D
Cosmopolitan	B	D	D	C
Dominance	D	D	B	C
Education Aid	A	A	B	A
Fancy	A	A	B	B
Global	C	F	D	D
High Q	C	D	D	B

It is further known that in terms of overall scores:

$$
1. High Q is better than Best Ed;
$$$$
2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and
$$$$
3. Education Aid is better than A-one.
$$$$

An agency entrusted to accredit colleges looks at four parameters: faculty quality (F), reputation (R), placement quality (P), and infrastructure (I). The four parameters are used to arrive at an overall score, which the agency uses to give an accreditation to the colleges. In each parameter, there are five possible letter grades given, each carrying certain points: A (50 points), B (40 points), C (30 points), D (20 points), and F (0 points). The overall score for a college is the weighted sum of the points scored in the four parameters. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed. $$ Accreditation is awarded based on the following scheme:

Range	Accreditation
Overall score ≥ 45	AAA
35 ≤ Overall score < 45	BAA
25 ≤ Overall score < 35	BBA
15 ≤ Overall score < 25	BBB
Overall score < 15	Junk

Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F, R, P, and I):

	F	R	P	I
A-one	A	A	A	B
Best Ed	B	C	D	D
Cosmopolitan	B	D	D	C
Dominance	D	D	B	C
Education Aid	A	A	B	A
Fancy	A	A	B	B
Global	C	F	D	D
High Q	C	D	D	B

It is further known that in terms of overall scores:

$$
1. High Q is better than Best Ed;
$$$$
2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and
$$$$
3. Education Aid is better than A-one.
$$$$

An agency entrusted to accredit colleges looks at four parameters: faculty quality (F), reputation (R), placement quality (P), and infrastructure (I). The four parameters are used to arrive at an overall score, which the agency uses to give an accreditation to the colleges. In each parameter, there are five possible letter grades given, each carrying certain points: A (50 points), B (40 points), C (30 points), D (20 points), and F (0 points). The overall score for a college is the weighted sum of the points scored in the four parameters. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed. $$ Accreditation is awarded based on the following scheme:

Range	Accreditation
Overall score ≥ 45	AAA
35 ≤ Overall score < 45	BAA
25 ≤ Overall score < 35	BBA
15 ≤ Overall score < 25	BBB
Overall score < 15	Junk

Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F, R, P, and I):

	F	R	P	I
A-one	A	A	A	B
Best Ed	B	C	D	D
Cosmopolitan	B	D	D	C
Dominance	D	D	B	C
Education Aid	A	A	B	A
Fancy	A	A	B	B
Global	C	F	D	D
High Q	C	D	D	B

It is further known that in terms of overall scores:

$$
1. High Q is better than Best Ed;
$$$$
2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and
$$$$
3. Education Aid is better than A-one.
$$$$

Each of the 23 boxes in the picture below represents a product manufactured by one of the following three companies: Alfa, Bravo and Charlie. The area of a box is proportional to the revenue from the corresponding product, while its centre represents the Product popularity and Market potential scores of the product (out of 20). The shadings of some of the boxes have got erased.

The companies classified their products into four categories based on a combination of scores (out of 20) on the two parameters - Product popularity and Market potential as given below:

	Promising	Blockbuster	Doubtful	No-hope
Product popularity score	> 10	> 10	≤ 10	≤ 10
Market potential score	> 10	≤ 10	> 10	≤ 10

The following facts are known:

Alfa and Charlie had the same total revenue considering all products.

Each of the 23 boxes in the picture below represents a product manufactured by one of the following three companies: Alfa, Bravo and Charlie. The area of a box is proportional to the revenue from the corresponding product, while its centre represents the Product popularity and Market potential scores of the product (out of 20). The shadings of some of the boxes have got erased.

The companies classified their products into four categories based on a combination of scores (out of 20) on the two parameters - Product popularity and Market potential as given below:

	Promising	Blockbuster	Doubtful	No-hope
Product popularity score	> 10	> 10	≤ 10	≤ 10
Market potential score	> 10	≤ 10	> 10	≤ 10

The following facts are known:

Alfa and Charlie had the same total revenue considering all products.

Each of the 23 boxes in the picture below represents a product manufactured by one of the following three companies: Alfa, Bravo and Charlie. The area of a box is proportional to the revenue from the corresponding product, while its centre represents the Product popularity and Market potential scores of the product (out of 20). The shadings of some of the boxes have got erased.

The companies classified their products into four categories based on a combination of scores (out of 20) on the two parameters - Product popularity and Market potential as given below:

	Promising	Blockbuster	Doubtful	No-hope
Product popularity score	> 10	> 10	≤ 10	≤ 10
Market potential score	> 10	≤ 10	> 10	≤ 10

The following facts are known:

Alfa and Charlie had the same total revenue considering all products.

Each of the 23 boxes in the picture below represents a product manufactured by one of the following three companies: Alfa, Bravo and Charlie. The area of a box is proportional to the revenue from the corresponding product, while its centre represents the Product popularity and Market potential scores of the product (out of 20). The shadings of some of the boxes have got erased.

The companies classified their products into four categories based on a combination of scores (out of 20) on the two parameters - Product popularity and Market potential as given below:

	Promising	Blockbuster	Doubtful	No-hope
Product popularity score	> 10	> 10	≤ 10	≤ 10
Market potential score	> 10	≤ 10	> 10	≤ 10

The following facts are known:

Alfa and Charlie had the same total revenue considering all products.

29:[["$"

Each visitor to an amusement park needs to buy a ticket. Tickets can be Platinum, Gold, or Economy. Visitors are classified as Old, Middle-aged, or Young. The following facts are known about visitors and ticket sales on a particular day: 1. $140$ tickets were sold. 2. The number of Middle-aged visitors was twice the number of Old visitors, while the number of Young visitors was twice the number of Middle-aged visitors. 3. Young visitors bought $38$ of the $55$ Economy tickets that were sold, and they bought half the total number of Platinum tickets that were sold. 4. The number of Gold tickets bought by Old visitors was equal to the number of Economy tickets bought by Old visitors.