Let a,b,m and n be natural numbers such that a>1 and b>1. If ambn=144145,thenthelargestpossiblevalueofn - m$ is
⌨️ Shortcuts:[1-4 / A-D] Select[Enter] Check[B] Star[S] Solution
Official Correct Answer: C. First off, when dealing with equations involving exponents, prime factorization is usually a good approach. So, let me factorize 144. I know that 144 is 12 squared, which is \( 12^2 \). But breaking it down further, 12 is 2 times 6, and 6 is 2 times 3. So, putting that together, 144 is \( 2^4 \times 3^2 \). Let me write that down:
\[ 144 = 2^4 \times 3^2 \]
Therefore, \( 144^{145} \) would be:
\[ (2^4 \times 3^2)^{145} \]
Using the exponent rule \( (x \times y)^n = x^n \times y^n \), this becomes:
\[ 2^{4 \times 145} \times 3^{2 \times 145} \]
\[ = 2^{580} \times 3^{290} \]
So, the equation \( a^m b^n = 144^{145} \) simplifies to:
\[ a^m b^n = 2^{580} \times 3^{290} \]
Now, since \( a \) and \( b \) are natural numbers greater than 1, they must be composed of the prime factors 2 and 3. Let me express \( a \) and \( b \) in terms of their prime factors. Let's say:
\[ a = 2^{x} \times 3^{y} \]
\[ b = 2^{p} \times 3^{q} \]
Where \( x, y, p, q \) are non-negative integers. Since \( a > 1 \) and \( b > 1 \), at least one of \( x \) or \( y \) must be positive for \( a \), and similarly for \( b \).
Substituting these into the equation \( a^m b^n \):
\[ (2^{x} \times 3^{y})^m \times (2^{p} \times 3^{q})^n = 2^{580} \times 3^{290} \]
Simplifying the exponents:
\[ 2^{x m + p n} \times 3^{y m + q n} = 2^{580} \times 3^{290} \]
Since the prime bases must be equal on both sides, we can set up the following equations:
1. \( x m + p n = 580 \) (for the exponent of 2)
2. \( y m + q n = 290 \) (for the exponent of 3)
Our goal is to maximize \( n - m \). To do this, we need to find suitable values of \( x, y, p, q \) such that both equations are satisfied, and \( n - m \) is as large as possible.
Let me think about how to approach this. Since we want to maximize \( n - m \), we should try to make \( n \) as large as possible and \( m \) as small as possible, given the constraints.
Looking at equation 1: \( x m + p n = 580 \). To minimize \( m \), we can set \( x \) and \( p \) to be as large as possible, but they are constrained by the prime factors of \( a \) and \( b \). However, since \( a \) and \( b \) can only have 2 and 3 as prime factors, \( x, y, p, q \) can be any non-negative integers.
Wait, but actually, \( a \) and \( b \) can have other prime factors as well, but since the right-hand side only has 2 and 3, \( a \) and \( b \) can't have any other prime factors. So, \( a \) and \( b \) must be of the form \( 2^k \times 3^l \), where \( k \) and \( l \) are non-negative integers.
Therefore, \( x, y, p, q \) can be any non-negative integers, but \( a \) and \( b \) must be greater than 1, so at least one of \( x \) or \( y \) must be positive for \( a \), and similarly for \( b \).
So, going back to the equations:
1. \( x m + p n = 580 \)
2. \( y m + q n = 290 \)
We need to find \( m \) and \( n \) such that these equations hold, with \( a, b > 1 \).
To maximize \( n - m \), we can try to express \( m \) and \( n \) in terms of the coefficients.
Let me consider equation 2 first: \( y m + q n = 290 \). Since 290 is half of 580, maybe there's a relationship here.
If I can set \( y = 2 \) and \( q = 1 \), then equation 2 becomes:
\[ 2 m + 1 n = 290 \]
Similarly, equation 1 would be:
\[ x m + p n = 580 \]
If I can set \( x = 1 \) and \( p = 2 \), then equation 1 becomes:
\[ 1 m + 2 n = 580 \]
So now we have a system of equations:
1. \( m + 2n = 580 \)
2. \( 2m + n = 290 \)
Let me solve this system.
From equation 2: \( 2m + n = 290 \). Let's solve for \( n \):
\[ n = 290 - 2m \]
Substitute this into equation 1:
\[ m + 2(290 - 2m) = 580 \]
\[ m + 580 - 4m = 580 \]
\[ -3m + 580 = 580 \]
\[ -3m = 0 \]
\[ m = 0 \]
But \( m \) must be a natural number greater than 1, so \( m = 0 \) is invalid. Hmm, that didn't work. Maybe my choice of \( x